CELEBRATING: SERMONS

"Sermon by Sharon Betcher" Feb 2nd

Back to Sermons

Grace and Peace be among us from the one we greet as Wisdom & Friend, Jesus our Christ. Amen.

I. Know-It-Alls: They're so hard to live with!
Today's epistle lesson can read like an ancient argument with seemingly little relevance: In cities like Corinth, "the butcher was a priest in service to some Greek or Roman deity.... Early Christians consequently had different ethical views on what to purchase at the meat market, some assuming it to be an insult to God to consume meat which had been roasted to tickle the nostrils of Zeus. Others[, the apparent know-it-alls,] said that since Christians didn't believe in Zeus, the meat was not sacrificial, just nutritional. . . . The conceited Corinthians, presuming validation of their erudite perspective, consulted Paul, who refers them to one of the great commandments: love your neighbor as yourself." Turning to those who were as sassy about what they knew about God as any adolescent ever presumes him/herself to be about life, Paul insisted that where knowledge "puffs up, love builds up." So as it turns out, it's an ancient argument with contemporary resonance: Know-it-alls were--then as now--hard to live with.


For most of the rest of the planet, we in the West are the know-it-alls....and just as hard to live with. We-purveyors of high tech and Hollywood and other necessities of gracious living--insist that we know what it is to be cultured. We shop the markets undeterred by ethical misgivings. Yet, writing even before 9.11's Fall of the Trade Temples, the political scientist Benjamin Barber observed that it was precisely the "spiritual poverty" of western culture," "the spiritual poverty of our education and of our markets," which "bear a portion of the blame for [Jihad's] war against modernity."

If that suggests one aspect of the difficulty of living with "know-it-alls" in our present global context, then equally knowledge has come to haunt us, its purveyors: we, but blurs on the information highway, bombarded by news infomatics 24-7, are on information overload with few means of discernment. Daily our lives maneuver webs of expert, if all too human, knowledge into which we must entrust ourselves-if not yet star wars missile defense systems, still daily we trust ourselves to everything from nuclear-generated power grids and preservatives to vaccinations and vehicles which hurls us at hundreds of miles an hour through the air. In a world in which "God apparently does not have a monopoly of power" (Cobb), desperation haunts our pursuit of knowledge-the human genome project, but the epitome of our hope to redeem life via knowledge. Yet that traps us in further quandries as knowledge is laid before us for which we are unprepared: Should one, for example, opt to cure sickle cell anemia when such hope is pinned to the same cell that makes one immune to malaria? Should we know if we carry cancer genes? What a frightening equation: so much knowledge at the flip of a switch or the twist and tweak of a genetic ribbon, so little time to think. And when we do, we scare ourselves half to death. Know-it-alls, we can't even live with ourselves.


Wondering the information highway, we find ourselves standing under the Tree of Knowledge once again: Did we presume the pursuit of knowledge to be without ethical implication? To be sure, the path of knowledge, of education, at least in the public eye, has and still bears the quality of a pretty harmless, innocent pursuit. Who would think to send our children off to school with a worry over what knowledge would do to them? Who would think to presume that the practice of knowledge might itself need special "know how?" Then again, might there be something like an ethically responsible use of knowledge?

Knowledge has been, at least in the ages of the Christian tradition, a spiritual aspiration, such that educational systems grew out of our intense desire to know the world, the very mind and body of God. Universities were, in another day, but the place of vision quests-places for finding one's self within the universe. No question, however, that this curiosity, this aspiration to know, can be and has become distorted. E.g., science, funded by for-profit research, can far over-stride that which occasions the premature deaths of the majority of human lives-dysentery, malaria, malnutrition, lack of sanitation, environmental ramifications. We know so much from quarks to quantums to chaos; we know so little about how to overcome poverty, inequality, greed, cynicism, despair, ...about how to effect justice and peace. We fail to connect our pursuits of knowledge with the Way of Wisdom; we fail to live our intellectual inquiry as a spiritual practice. Like adolescents with attitude, well, we know, we know (But we know not what to do with what we know). Knowledge can be its own temptation to ultimacy, to control, to conceit. Or, knowledge can be practiced as a form of neighbor-love, as Paul seemed to suggest, recognizing that no freedom of conscience was possible without concern for the community, the kin-dom, the commons of life.



II. As buddhism lays out the path of mindfulness, training the mind to empty out its pre-conceptions so as to hospitably welcome the w/holly other, so too Christianity has a path of mindful intelligence. As Christians have aspired to it, knowledge unquestionably begins as a "falling in wonder with the world," which goes far to explain why physicists may often be counted among our contemporary mystics. Yet Christians have also over the centuries been concerned that selfishness can pass itself off as reason, that systems of acquisitiveness can masquerade as but true to human nature. Jewish prophets and the later desert Ammas and Abbas (mothers and fathers) of Christian faith worried that the way in which the rich viewed the world could literally become the law of the land, that the reason of the propertied would be weighted with judicial power, while the majority suffered. Reformation theologian Martin Luther spoke out against the "prudence of the flesh," which led a person to believe that s/he was the final and ultimate object of life. Conversely, "'prudence of the spirit' is," Luther insisted, "the choice of the common good... It regards as good [and reasonable] only those things which are ...for the benefit of all. Gerard Winstanley, a failed tradesperson who initiated "the Diggers," a 17th century English movement which settled the displaced, urban poor by turning the town commons into an agrarian communitarian experiment, echoed Luther's sentiment: "Those that are resolved to work and eat together, making the earth a common treasury, join hands with Christ to lift up the creation from bondage." Common sense would make of the earth a shared commons, Winstanley observed. The selfish imagination, on the other hand, put the earth-the land, the commoners, the creatures-in bondage to mastery.


What our ancestors called covetousness, the selfish imagination... What we call desire and make the most of... These energies, which cloak themselves as reason and the reasonable, today threaten world interdependence: since the turn into the contemporary scientific age, knowledge has been, by definition, that which gave us "power over" the elements, that which gave us dominion over the earth. Schooled in such a path of knowledge we have objectified and reduced the world around us to resources for our needs and ever growing catalog of wants. We have pursued the human venture of creativity without balancing our interests with those of nature and neighbor. Today, via globalization, this kind of knowledge as "power over" pulls resources into the orbit of the West. And yet its fallacy, its myopia, by now is well known: we cannot secure ourselves without securing the well-being of others. We deceive ourselves with our pretense to knowledge without love of neighbor.


III. But dare we, Do we know how to change our minds, to practice knowledge as neighbor love?
The Christian path of mindfulness actually also has a practice-named, Sabbath. Sabbath, the day of rest, restores an alternative consciousness-a way of knowing that proceeds from being known, from resting back into holy presence. To see the world as a place of grace, of God-haunted presence (which does not overlook the scaring, searing hot spots) leads us to practice knowledge as communion with God within the daily world. The practice of Christian mindfulness starts like this: play before you work! Fall back in wonder with the world. Unseat the controlling, dominating way of relating to our earth-kin. Sabbath, an ancient pattern of refraining from intervening in the environment through labor, stills the acquisitiveness that sets in with busyness--as we take time, waste time, coming to know God in the deep repose and wonder of creation. Theologian Jurgen Moltmann explains it this way: "Sanctifying the sabbath means being entirely free from the striving for happiness and from the will for performance and achievement. It means being wholly present in the presence of God" (Moltmann GiC). This shared quiescence with Holy Wisdom herself restores us to the energies of elemental communion-the sharing of the common elements of life as common sense.

IV. Yet if Sabbath experience re-orients our thinking to recognize earth as a common, if graced place, in a world in which "God does not have a monopoly on power" (Cobb), critical thinking becomes the responsibility of mindful Christians: If the university was at one time a place for a vision quest, a place to learn to be a democratic citizen, education has become an escalator up in and assurance of economic status. In a society which has organized itself for increased wealth, educational systems--as theologian John Cobb reminds us--have been subtly given over to producing those who will be successful in the market. Whereas science once simply aspired to knowing the mysteries of microbe and Milky Way, "it now serves industry. Whereas medicine once aimed at human health, it too has been transformed into the medical industry" (Cobb, "Can Church Help God Save World?"). It is in this sense that Paul's letter to the Corinthians can again assume applicability: Knowledge can be a practice of neighbor love. Know-it-alls-those without such neighbor-love--are extremely hard to live with.


Yet, if universities must be held accountable for the practice of knowledge (and we for the knowledge there acquired), Christian spiritualities have often in response wielded a dismissive anti-intellectualism. Spiritualities have as often renounced the path of the intellect as universities have rejected that practice of ethical reflection which we might call the turn from knowledge into wisdom. If spiritualists know that-as per Paul-"knowledge puffs up," I would, however, contend that Paul recommended not an avoidance of the pursuit of knowledge, but a loving way of knowing. We need as Christians to recall the practice of serious, communal ethical deliberation, particularly about how that which we invoke as God critiques the coursing powers of the world--one of which we today call "globalization." At the global marketplace, so titillated with choices beyond number, can we discern the "freedom to buy" from the right to choose the common good, "the social character of our shared world...." (Barber 117)? To engage critical thinking, as spiritual practitioners like the prophets, Winstanley and Luther have shown, means thinking about thought itself-about how we can make knowledge bend to our view of the world, about where we hide our envy, ambitions, hopes, cravings, and desperation in what we claim to know. Belief in God may not be amenable to every way of doing things. The practice of a holy communion of the elements of life may not be compatible with sampling everything available at the global marketplace.


Commenting both on the controlling instrumentality of our applied knowledge and the decline in public educational funding, political scientist Benjamin Barber later in his text Jihad vs. McWorld laments that today "smart bombs are given preference over smart people." To be sure, knowledge-or rather, a glut of information-does not alone make us smart. In the words of Abba Anthony, one of the desert fathers of the early centuries of Christianity, here echoing Paul's epistlery sentiment: "Our life and death is with our neighbor... If we scandalize our sister/brother we have lost God" (Bondi 96). We seek Holy Wisdom not as a path of self-fulfillment that will make us independent from the need for others; rather, we seek Holy Wisdom in order to love the others with whom we are interdependent. An interdependent world needs not so much another crop of know-it-alls as those who can think seriously about how to effect love of neighbor, about how to work and eat together, to make the earth a commons.



Back to Top

 


Shaughnessy Heights United Church congregation is a Christian faith community respecting each other in our diversity and reaching out to all who seek God’s love.

1550 West 33rd Avenue,
Vancouver, BC V6M 1A7
Canada SEE MAP

Tel: 604-261-6377
Email: admin@shuc.ca


Copyright © 2003 Shaughnessy Heights United Church
Send feedback to admin@shuc.ca. Report problems to webmaster@shuc.ca.

Site Use Disclaimer
.